Saturday, 5 September 2015

Brazilian Women Who Want to Be Teachers Must First Take Virginity Tests

Women in Sao Paulo, Brazil are reportedly
being forced to prove they’re not sexually
active in order to obtain long-term teaching
positions.
According to the International Business
Times , a pap smear is required to show
they don’t have any diseases, as well as
other invasive exams to prove that they’re
not sexually active.
If they’d prefer to avoid such exams, they
must submit a doctor’s certificate
confirming that they rarely, if ever engage
in sex.
The education department claims that the
tests are to ensure that candidates are in
good physical shape to prevent them from
taking any extended or frequent absences
while teaching.
“The health inspections are intended to
ensure, beyond technical ability, the physical
and mental ability of candidates to keep
their jobs for an average of 25 years,” the
department said .
It’s not just young women that are
subjected to such exams. Older women are
required to have mammograms, and men
over 40 are forced to have their prostate
tested.
While the health of an older candidate could
play a factor in their ability to teach long-
term, the subject of a women’s virginity or
sexual activeness is in no way necessary
information.
It’s merely a gross invasion of a woman’s
privacy.
One 27-year-old woman told a news site
that she was deeply embarrassed and
ashamed to ask her doctor for a note
saying she was a virgin so she could avoid
the additional tests.
Understandably, women’s rights groups
are infuriated
“It violates women’s rights. It’s very
intimate information that she has the right
to keep. It’s absurd to continue with these
demands,” Sao Paulo activist Ana Paula de
Oliveria Castro said .
Others are outraged as well. The
conservative group Catholics for the Right
to Choose claims the practice is medieval,
and Brazil’s national Special Secretariat for
Women’s Rights says it compromises a
woman’s privacy.
“The woman has the right to choose
whether to take an exam… Such policies
violate protections of human dignity and the
principle of equality and right to private lie,”
they said.
Meanwhile, the Sao Paulo bar association
calls it unconstitutional.
Sadly, this isn’t the first time women in
Brazil have been subjected to such
sexist demands. In the Northeastern part of
the country, women applying for positions
in law enforcement were forced to undergo
tests that determined whether their hymens
were torn. Thankfully, that practice has
since been shut down.
Meanwhile, the women of Sao Paulo hold
to a similar hope: That the government will
abolish this disgusting requirement.
A person’s ability to perform a job cannot
be assessed based on something as private
as their sexuality. These women (and men)
deserved to judged based on their merit
alone.

Is It Ethical to Chemically Castrate a Child Sex Offender?

When it comes to its convicted child sex
offenders, Australia is considering nipping
the problem in the bud, literally. The
country may soon require perpetrators to be
chemically castrated instead of sent to
prison, VICE News reports.
New South Wales’ justice minister, Troy
Grant, would like the treatment to be made
mandatory since the rate of recidivism for
sex offenders is so high, according to the
Australian Broadcasting Corporation . About
17 percent are arrested for a similar crime
within two years of being released from
prison. Currently, sex criminals can
volunteer for treatment, but are not required
to undergo it.
Child sexual abuse runs rampant in
Australia. Thirty percent of the population
reports having fallen victim to it in their
lifetime, 10 percent of whom say the abuse
was “severe,” a report by the Australian
Institute of Criminology found.
Anti-libidinal treatment is nothing new. In
fact, courts in Western Australia and
Victoria can already mandate libido-
reduction treatment to convicts who have
been deemed dangerous by prison
standards.
In the US, child sex offenders could
potentially be sentenced to life in prison;
many opt to undergo anti-libidinal treatment
instead of extended prison stays, especially
since even after sex-offending convicts are
released, at least seven states mandate
they remain in confinement.
Compared to other offenses, recidivism
rates for sex criminals in America are not
as high. Only about 5 percent are sent
back to prison within three years for a
similar crime. Yet states such as Iowa,
Florida and California can require sex
offenders to be administered libido-
eliminating treatment.
Sex offenders may not be a particularly
sympathetic group since they pose a
serious threat to the most vulnerable
members of society, children. Still, many
feel chemical castration goes too far.
Both Amnesty International and the
American Civil Liberties Union in the US
have condemned the practice, calling it
inhumane.
“At first sight, forced chemical castration
could be taken as a matter-of-course
decision; however, it is incompatible with
human rights, which are the foundation of
any civilized democratic society,” read a
statement by Amnesty International in
March 2012.
In addition to the controversy around
forcing people to take drugs they may not
want in their bodies, the drugs used for
chemical castration don’t come without their
fair share of side effects, namely symptoms
mimicking menopause in women.
While chemical castration is touted as very
effective, data surrounding it are difficult to
measure. Sex offenders have been shown
to have higher levels of testosterone — the
hormone responsible for libido and sexual
function — but no clear cause-and-effect
relationship between high levels of
testosterone and sex offending has been
established, according to study in the
Journal of Korean Medical Science.
Teetering between a punishment and
treatment, chemical castration will forever
remain a question of both criminal justice
and medical ethics. While sex offenders do
need to be punished to deter them from
committing similar crimes in the future,
they also need to be rehabilitated. Is anti-
libidinal treatment the best way to go about
it?
“In a way, I liken it to cutting the hand off
the thief,” Don Grubin, a professor of
forensic psychiatry at Newcastle University,
told CNN . “It’s very symbolic.”

Friday, 4 September 2015

Chemical Castration Mandatory for Sex Offenders Under New Guam Bill

Sex offenders on parole would be forced to undergo
chemical castration under a bill passed by a split Guam
legislature this week.
The “Chemical Castration for Sex Offenders Act” was
passed by an 8-7 vote in the island’s senate.
Pending a signature of the nation’s governor, the bill would
require sex offenders on parole to undergo hormone
treatments to eliminate their libido.
“The purpose of the program is to reduce the risk of
reoffending after release or post-prison supervision by
providing certain persons convicted or sex crimes, who are
deemed medically appropriate for the supervision program,
with hormone or anti-androgen, such as
medroxyprogesterone acetate, each year,” the bill states.
The parolee would also be required to pay for the castration
process under the pilot program, which would last four
years.
“It’s an important message; it’s a message that we as a
body will not support this type of crime any more,” said Sen.
Brant McCreadie, according to a report in USA Today. “It’s a
stern, loud-and-clear message to any offenders out there
that there’s going to be consequences.”
Fifty-three sex offenders are currently serving prison time
on the U.S. island territory, according to the newspaper
report.

Chemical castration bill passes by 1 vote

In a close 8-7 vote Thursday, lawmakers passed legislation
that would allow the Department of Corrections to begin
chemically castrating convicted sex offenders who are
preparing to be released on parole.
“This is a good day for the island of Guam,” said Sen. Brant
McCreadie, who introduced the “Chemical Castration for
Sex Offenders Act” to reduce recidivism rates of sex
offenders at the island’s prison. “It’s an important
message; it’s a message that we as a body will not support
this type of crime any more. It’s a stern, loud-and-clear
message to any offenders out there that there’s going to be
consequences.”
Pending Gov. Eddie Calvo’s signature, the bill would launch
a four-year pilot program at DOC in which eligible sex
offenders could be selected to undergo anti-androgen
treatment. Anti-androgen treatment is the use of hormone
medication such as medroxyprogesterone acetate to
control inappropriate sexual behavior. It essentially reduces
a person’s sex drive.
Speaker Judith Won Pat, Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz and
Sens. Tom Ada, Tina Muña Barnes, Mike San Nicolas, Mary
Torres and Nerissa Underwood voted against the bill.
If enacted, the Guam Parole Board could require qualifying
individuals to participate in the program as a condition of
parole. The parolee would also be required to foot the costs
of the treatment during their parole period.
A provision in the bill would allow the individual to
voluntarily opt for the permanent alternative of physical
castration. The person wouldn’t be required to participate in
the pilot program if he decides to undergo physical
castration, according to the bill.
The legislative body debated the measure during session
Wednesday, when amendments were proposed, including
the provision to include the four-year time span.
Lawmakers also included a sunset provision, requiring DOC
to produce an evaluation report that details “the
effectiveness and financial impact” of the program. The
report must be completed by the third year of the program’s
implementation so the Legislature could determine whether
to authorize the program’s continuation.
On Wednesday, the Guam Parole Board told McCreadie
there are 53 sex offenders currently serving prison time at
DOC who will be eligible for release on parole within three
years.
“We think that’s a viable number that we’ll be able to get the
data and start the treatments and see where it goes from
there,” McCreadie said.
“The continued treatment and management of the patient’s
condition on an outpatient basis has also been determined
to greatly reduce incident of violence and arrests,” the 24-
page bill states.
Under court order, behavioral health clients are interned to
receive treatment and must be released after they’ve
fulfilled the criteria of their court orders.
Other bills passed
This week, the Legislature deliberated nearly a dozen other
bills, unanimously passing the majority of them Thursday
morning.
Of the bills unanimously passed was “Baby Alexya Law,”
which would establish an outpatient treatment service for
certain individuals with a mental illness or condition. Sen.
Dennis Rodriguez Jr. named the bill after 1-year old Alexya
Esser, who earlier this year was reportedly struck in the
face by Yu Hua Han, a former mental health patient.
The Baby Alexya Law would establish an assisted
outpatient treatment service under the Guam Behavioral
Health and Wellness Center. Qualified patients with
treatable mental illnesses would receive court-ordered
treatment on an outpatient basis.
“The continued treatment and management of the patient’s
condition on an outpatient basis has also been determined
to greatly reduce incident of violence and arrests,” the 24-
page bill states.
Under court order, behavioral health clients are interned to
receive treatment and must be released after they’ve
fulfilled the criteria of their court order.
Senators in an 11-4 decision also passed the “Catastrophic
Leave Pool Act,” which intends to establish a sick-leave
pool for government employees who’ve been diagnosed
with a “catastrophic illness.”
The measure allows an employee who has a “catastrophic
illness” to receive sick leave from a pool, which would be an
accumulation of donated sick leave time.
Won Pat, Cruz, Torres and Sen. Rory Respicio voted against
the bill.
All 12 bills passed in Thursday’s session will be sent to
Adelup. Gov. Eddie Calvo has 10 days to sign, veto or allow
the measures to lapse into law.

Without the illegal allowances, these are what your Senators, Reps earn

Going by the remuneration
approved for them by the
Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation
and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC),
the annual take-home (excluding
estacode, Duty Tour Allowance
(DTA) and some sundry
allowances which they are paid as
necessary), of each of the 360
members of the House of
Representatives is estimated at
N18.26 million.
Each of the 109 senators earns a
bit higher, pocketing N19.66
million each a year, PREMIUM
TIMES analyses have shown.
Additionally, each senator collects
N1.01 million a year for his or
her domestic staff, while each
member of the House of
Representatives collects N1million
for the same purpose.
Each lawmaker gets N202, 640 as
Newspapers/Periodicals allowance
per annum.
Based on the approved pay
schedule, N1.4billion is spent on
the 469 lawmakers as furniture
allowance annually, while their
car loan stands at N2.34billion
per annum.
These figures taken together, the
360 members of the House of
Representatives gulp N6.58 billion
from the nation’s treasury in
annual salaries and allowances,
while the 109 Senators cost the
nation N2.14 billion in similar
emoluments.
Cumulatively, the country shells
out a hefty N8.72 billion every
year in salaries and allowances to
lawmakers in the two chambers
of the National Assembly.
However, the amount the
Senators and Members of the
House of Representatives remit as
tax appears insignificant as their
income tax is calculated as a
function of their basic salaries
alone.
Yet the allowances, which are
non-taxed are about 870 percent
(Senators) and 820 percent (Reps)
of their basic salaries.
PREMIUM TIMES analyses of the lawmakers’
pay did however not include the illegal but
hefty quarterly allowances lawmakers pay
themselves – they call it office running cost.
It is unclear how much it is now. In 2009, it
was N192million per senator per quarter
while their House of Representatives
counterparts received N140 million per
quarter.
Insiders say the “allowances” have increased
dramatically over time. Lawmakers wouldn’t
disclose how it is.
In the twilight of the Seventh Assembly, led by
David Mark of the Peoples Democratic Party,
the clamour by Nigerian civil society
organizations only forced the legislators to
knock off N20billion from their budgetary
allocation, thus making them cut the habitual
annual budget of N150 billion to N130 billion.
First term senator Ben Murray-Bruce’s call for
reduction in allowances of members of the
National Assembly received widespread
commendation.
A number of lawmakers followed suit, giving
support to Mr. Murray-Bruce’s populist
proposal. But no such reduction in
emoluments have so far been effected.
The N7.8 billion the federal lawmakers will
pocket this year is almost the sum total of
2015 capital allocation to the Power Sector
(N4.24billion, the Ministry of Women Affairs
(N1.25billion), the Federal Ministry of
Communication Technology (N500million), the
Federal Ministry of Justice and the National
Human Rights Commission (N500million), the
Ministry of Science and Technology
(N500million), the Ministry of Petroleum
Resources (N500million), the Ministry of
Labour and Productivity (N200million) and
the Ministry of Police Affairs (N150million).
The infographics below give graphic analyses
of the lawmakers’ salaries and allowances:

Source: Premium Times.

FACT-CHECK: Buhari, APC lied in disowning campaign document, “My Covenant With Nigerians”

The claims by President Muhammadu Buhari and his party, the All Progressives Congress, that a key campaign document,
“My Covenant With Nigerians” did not emerge from them is false and misleading, a PREMIUM TIMES investigation has shown.
Extensive checks by this newspaper showed that not only was the document circulated in the run-up to the April 11 presidential election by staff of Mr. Buhari’s campaign organization, the literature was also extensively
promoted by party officials, including using the APC website to do so.
It was the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity,
Garba Shehu, who kicked off the campaign of distancing the APC and Mr.
Buhari from two of the key campaign documents that apparently swayed a lot of
votes for the president and his party.
In a widely circulated opinion article published on August 28, Mr. Shehu wrote, “In the course of electioneering, the presidential campaign had
so many centres of public communication
which, for whatever reason, were on the loose.
“There is a certain document tagged ‘One
Hundred Things Buhari Will Do in 100 Days’
and the other, ‘My Covenant With Nigerians’.
Both pamphlets bore the authorized party logo
but as the Director of Media and
Communications in that campaign, I did not
fund or authorize any of those. I can equally bet
my last kobo that candidate Buhari did not see
or authorize those publications.
“As a consequence of these publications,
expectations have been raised unreasonably,
that as President, Muhammadu Buhari will wave
his hand and all the problems that the country
faces- insecurity, corruption, unemployment,
poor infrastructure – would go away.”
On Monday, the National Publicity Secretary for
the APC, Lai Mohammed, picked the baton from
where Mr. Shehu dropped it. Speaking during
an interview with Channels Television, Mr.
Mohammed said President Buhari and the party
had nothing to do with any other campaign
materials apart from the APC manifesto and
constitution.
“Buhari never promised to do anything in 100
days, that’s the honest truth,” Mr. Mohammed.
“You see, when you are running a campaign, all
kinds of literature will emerge from all sorts of
groups but there are only two documents that
you can judge a party with: That is the
constitution of the party and the manifesto of
the party.
“Those are the only two documents that are
registered with the Independent National
Electoral Commission; you can go to court or
hold a party accountable for them.”
Both officials spoke just as Nigerians began the
countdown to Mr. Buhari’s first 100 days in
office with conversations going on over whether
the president and his party were on the path to
delivering the “change” they promised. Mr.
Buhari would be 100-day old in office on
Saturday, September 5.
But investigations by this newspaper showed
that by disowning the “My Covenant With
Nigerians” document, President Buhari and his
party were likely being dishonest and deceitful.
While a volunteer group backed by the party
and the presidential campaign may have
produced the document on ‘One Hundred
Things Buhari Will Do in 100 Days’, PREMIUM
TIMES can authoritatively report that the policy
and research directorate of the APC presidential
campaign, headed by former Governor Kayode
Fayemi, produced the covenant document.
Mr. Fayemi could not be reached for comments
Tuesday. His aides say he is travelling in Cote
D’ivoire with Vice President Yemi Osinbajo.
Party insiders said the document, which
harmonised promises contained in the party’s
manifesto and various campaign speeches by
Mr. Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo,
was produced after rigorous and extensive
deliberation with top campaign officials and the
president himself.
After the president signed off on the final
version of the covenant, insiders say, the
document was emailed to journalists at the time
by well-known campaign staff charged with
circulating publicity materials for the
organization during the period.
For instance, Egghead Odewale, who worked at
the headquarters of the presidential campaign
in Abuja, sent a PDF version of the document to
PREMIUM TIMES on March 12.
Apparently concerned that the document was
not getting enough publicity, another campaign
official emailed a word version to reporters on
March 16.
Newspapers and websites thereafter ran several
stories on the document.
Vanguard’s version of the report, entitled “ My
contract with Nigeria – Buhari” was later
republished by the APC on its website at 8:52
a.m on March 17.


Story on “My Covenant With Nigeria”
republished by APC website


The then Lagos governor, Babatunde Fashola,
who was in charge of fundraising for the
campaign, delivered a campaign speech on
March 23, where he clearly referred to the
document.
“The APC is proud to have as its flag-bearer, a
patriot with the public stature and integrity of
Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, who has
unreservedly committed to this vision and
mission as reflected in his Covenant with
Nigerians and campaigns promises,” Mr. Fashola
said at a meeting of APC governors at the
Banquet Hall of the Imo State Government
House, Owerri.
“It is not by accident that teeming millions of
Nigerians are showing their support effusively
for Gen. Buhari.”
PREMIUM TIMES can also report that “The
Covenant With Nigeria” was also one of the
documents the Ahmed Joda-led Transition
Committee used in producing an 800-page
report detailing swift steps Mr. Buhari must take
to fix Nigeria.
The volume of the report that dealt with social
issues repeatedly referred to the document now
being disowned.
For instance, in a subsection on environment
and climate change, the committee reminded the
president of his promises as contained in “The
Covenant With Nigerians”, and then proceeded
to make recommendations.


A page of the report of the Ahmed Joda-led
Transition Committee


Mr. Buhari accepted the committee’s report
without any complaint, and promised to
implement the recommendations.
But when contacted Tuesday, Mr. Shehu insisted
the party and the campaign had no knowledge
of the document.
He quoted the president as saying he would not
engage in deception, and would never allow
himself to be tagged with a document he had no
knowledge of.
Background
In signing off on the 16-page document, Mr.
Buhari said in an introductory note, “This
covenant is to outline my agenda for Nigeria
and provide a bird’s eye view of how we intend
to bring about the change that our country
needs and deserves.
“The covenant is derived from the manifesto of
my party, the All Progressives Congress. It
however represents my pledge to you all when I
become your president.”
Mr. Buhari now appeared challenged delivering
on the promises contained in the covenant, and
his team has been battling to disown the
document.
For instance, the document quoted the then
presidential candidate as promising to publicly
declare his assets and liabilities while also
encouraging his political appointees to do so. He
is yet to fulfill that promise.


Nigerians will soon see the ‘change’ I promised– Buhari

President Muhammadu Buhari
has assured that Nigerians will
soon see the fulfilment of his
election campaign promises.
He spoke on Wednesday in Abuja
while receiving university
students.
The president assured Nigerian
youth that his government’s anti-
corruption campaign would
secure their future.
In an address to members of the
National Association of Nigerian
Students (NANS) who marched to
the presidential villa to pledge
their full support for his anti-
corruption campaign, President
Buhari promised that he will do
his best to place Nigeria well on
the way to becoming the nation of
their dreams.
“Everything you have asked for
are the things that will make for a
good country, and what we are
after is a good country, a country
where our youths can have a
future and a hope,” the president
said.
“We are totally committed to
building a country where our
youths can realize their full
potential.
“You can be assured that your
welfare and well-being are
topmost in our minds and very
soon you will see the things we
have promised come to fruition.
“During the campaigns, change
was our slogan, but today it is no
longer a mere slogan, it is now a
reality and we will see it in every
facet of our lives.
“The youth will feel it, the adults
will feel it and old people will feel
it and we will get the country of
our dreams,’’ the president, who
was represented by his Special
Adviser (Media & Publicity), Femi
Adesina, said.
Mr. Adesina later received a
document addressed to President
Buhari from the NANS President,
Tijani Usman Shehu, and
promised that the president will
look into their requests.
In his remarks, Mr. Shehu said
the students were united against
corruption, cybercrime,
prostitution, human trafficking,
drug abuse and other anti-social
vices.
“Nigerian students demand that
our future must be secured and
we strongly believe in the President’s zero
tolerance for corruption,’’ he said.